A couple who does not live together, for example, may agree to spend two nights of the week alone or with friends as a sign of their autonomy. Instead, they are understood as supporting the other need, as well as the relationship itself. It forms the basis of his “transcendent function” that leads to psychological change an accessible introduction to this concept can be found here. I hope that these examples sufficiently indicate what I mean by Reductionism. For example, the two ends of the dialectic are not viewed as opposing or contradictory at all. Carl Jung, who studied alchemy, weaved the union of opposites into his various psychological writings.
Dialectic example plus#
The concept was later adopted by alchemists, who observed that compounding two dissimilar chemicals can result in a third unlike either parent (e.g., sodium, a highly reactive metal, plus chlorine, a poisonous gas, produces table salt). This “union of opposites” was first described by pre-Socratic philosophers (and by Taoists, as in the well-known Yin-Yang symbol of interdependence). For example: Example: Sarah is a social worker who helps children in schools who are having trouble with their families. A dialectic is a relationship between two opposing concepts. Taking a dialectical approach allows us to capture the dynamism of intercultural communication. Therefore, it is not always easy to conceptualize or study. As Hegel wrote, a clash of thesis and antithesis may result in a new third way, a synthesis that incorporates, yet transcends, both sides of the argument. Social workers will use relational dialectics to help people work through interpersonal communication issues. Communication across cultures and co-cultures is complicated, messy, and at times contradictory.
Except in extreme cases, we simply don’t know which option is best for the individual in our office. When clients grapple with such questions, therapists of any school should refrain from choosing sides or giving advice.
0 kommentar(er)
